With enough circumstantial evidence, the prosecution hoped that the Court would be able to infer that the accused was guilty. That is, indirect evidence that linked the accused to the crime. For decades, the case remained unsolved, but thanks to breakthroughs in DNA technology, a suspect was eventually tried and convicted of her murder.īecause Louise Bell’s body was never found, the prosecution case relied on circumstantial evidence. The police believed that she had been murdered. In January 1983, Louise Bell was abducted from her home in the Adelaide suburb of Hackham West. In this case, we see how the question of what is reasonable doubt can become more complicated.īackground – murder mystery and reasonable doubt One of the big issues in any criminal law case is the concept of guilt beyond reasonable doubt. It was one of South Australia’s most enduring and high profile cold cases until recently, when a man was tried for her abduction and murder. When 10-year-old Louise Bell disappeared from her bedroom on a balmy summer’s night in 1983, the nation was shocked.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |